<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vindication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thompsonwerk.com/2009/09/vindication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thompsonwerk.com/2009/09/vindication/</link>
	<description>Uniting History and the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.thompsonwerk.com/2009/09/vindication/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thompsonwerk.com/?p=549#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Military history, at least in the US, has always been equated with people who can recite gun calibers and how many bullets were fired at Gettysburg. In the last few decades, the field has changed drastically. War and Society studies are more than one dimensional battlefield examinations. Other historians, however, rarely give notice to any of those changes and chose to ignore military history as a legitimate field. The lack of respect for the field was one of the reasons why I went to Canada to get my MA. Fortunately the War and Society community in Canada introduced me to US institutions that were striving to legitimize the field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Military history, at least in the US, has always been equated with people who can recite gun calibers and how many bullets were fired at Gettysburg. In the last few decades, the field has changed drastically. War and Society studies are more than one dimensional battlefield examinations. Other historians, however, rarely give notice to any of those changes and chose to ignore military history as a legitimate field. The lack of respect for the field was one of the reasons why I went to Canada to get my MA. Fortunately the War and Society community in Canada introduced me to US institutions that were striving to legitimize the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://www.thompsonwerk.com/2009/09/vindication/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thompsonwerk.com/?p=549#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Well thats good news. I&#039;m afraid though that the state of Military History has always been worse than here in the UK. I think the emergence of War Studies as an interdisciplinary subject in the 60&#039;s has aided its place in British academia. Though 9/11 and GWOT has had a similar effect here with an increase in the number of programmes around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thats good news. I&#8217;m afraid though that the state of Military History has always been worse than here in the UK. I think the emergence of War Studies as an interdisciplinary subject in the 60&#8242;s has aided its place in British academia. Though 9/11 and GWOT has had a similar effect here with an increase in the number of programmes around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
